James Cameron’s Titanic went to great lengths to replicate the disappearance of the unsinkable ship. Here’s what the movie got wrong about dividing the ship.
James Cameron 1997 Titanic is one of the most iconic films in the history of cinema – but even the greatest sometimes get it wrong. While much of the film stuck with scientific specifics, a lack of research at the time meant that some of the details regarding the ship’s division weren’t entirely accurate. So what details does James Cameron have Titanic be wrong about the true division of the ship?
The RMS Titanic sailed on April 10, 1912, from Southampton, England, to New York. Only a few days later, the liner hit the iceberg which would be its downfall. When the Titanic was lost in the ocean on April 15, more than 1,500 lives were lost. Cameron is committed to establishing the facts about the sinking of the Titanic. After the discovery of the shipwreck in 1985, Cameron made several trips on the ship itself, wanting to uncover the secrets of one of the most famous wrecks in history. Using eyewitness accounts and evidence from the wreckage, the true story of the Titanic the shipwreck was revealed.
In the heyday of James Cameron Titanic, the Olympic-class liner is heading toward the bottom of the Atlantic Ocean at a 45-degree angle. As passengers struggled to grab onto the deck, the ship begins to split in half, sending the top half into the water below at a 90-degree angle – although this theory is good for theater, the evidence suggest that this did not really happen. manner. Using pieces of the ship recovered from the ocean floor, investigators were able to recreate the sinking of the ship using models. While experts and eyewitnesses disagree that the bow or stern was underwater, the evidence points to a much less steep angle than that described in the Titanic; between 11 and 23 degrees. Damage from the collision with the iceberg caused one half of the ship to fill with water, pulling it underwater and lifting the other up into the air. As the ship’s deck broke, the Titanic snapped in half, sending it plunging beneath the waves. The ship’s flutter after the slam was also over-dramatized. Instead of floating like a cork in water, the ship was probably pulled under the weight of the water that had filled it.
While most pundits agree Cameron’s portrayal was more dramatic than reality, this is where they seem to stop agreeing. After the initial sinking, investigators believed the ship had sunk entirely. It wasn’t until the ship was discovered in pieces in the 1980s that it was confirmed that the ship had indeed broken in two. The theories as to how this happened are numerous. Experts disagree on whether the bow or stern was submerged first and whether the deck or keel failed first. They don’t even agree that the ship even split or if the pieces were created by an explosion or fire. Some division theories turned out to be impossible, such as the bow of the ship rising out of the water after the initial sinking.
We may never know exactly how the Titanic to divide. Eyewitness accounts vary widely, and the evidence lends itself to multiple theories. Experts continue to pounce on this great mystery, determined to unravel its secrets. While new developments may disprove Cameron’s theory, it’s obvious the director went to great lengths to make the epic sink. Titanic as precise as he could.
Next: Titanic Deleted Scenes Honor The Movie’s Best Cut Out True Stories
Venom 2 Credit Scene Connects Topher Grace’s Venom To Tom Hardy’s – Theory Explained
About the Author